MARC보기
LDR00000cam u2200205 a 4500
001000014067877
00520240510154740
006m d
007cr cnu---unuuu
008230729t20232023dcud ob 000 0 eng d
020 ▼a 9780309703536 ▼q electronic book
020 ▼a 0309703530 ▼q electronic book
020 ▼a 0309703557 ▼q electronic book
020 ▼a 9780309703550 ▼q (electronic bk.)
020 ▼z 0309703522
020 ▼z 9780309703529 ▼q paperback
035 ▼a 3661351 ▼b (N$T)
035 ▼a (OCoLC)1391438592 ▼z (OCoLC)1391677644 ▼z (OCoLC)1398122512
040 ▼a EBLCP ▼b eng ▼c EBLCP ▼d YDX ▼d OCLCQ ▼d SMC ▼d NTE ▼d YDX ▼d OCLCF ▼d OCLCO ▼d N$T ▼d 224010 ▼e pn
043 ▼a n-us---
050 4 ▼a R854.U5 ▼b R67 2023
08204 ▼a 610.72/073 ▼2 22
090 ▼a 610.72073
1001 ▼a Rosenberg, Dara, ▼e rapporteur.
24510 ▼a Sponsor influences on the quality and independence of health research ▼h [electronic resource] / ▼c Dara Rosenberg, Elizabeth Boyle, Alexandra McKay, and Joe Alper, rapporteurs ; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice ; Board on Health Sciences Policy, Health and Medicine Division.
260 ▼a Washington, DC: ▼b National Academies Press, ▼c [2023]
300 ▼a 1 online resource (xiv, 104 pages) : ▼b charts (some color)
500 ▼a "Proceedings of a Workshop"
500 ▼a Description based upon print version of record.
504 ▼a Includes bibliographical references (pages 79-85).
5050 ▼a Intro -- FrontMatter -- Reviewers -- Contents -- Box, Figures, and Tables -- Acronyms and Abbreviations -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Do Sponsoring Organizations Influence Research? -- 3 Example of Funder Influence on Health Research -- 4 Protection of Research Integrity -- 5 Considering Models, Processes, and Principles to Protect Research Independence and Quality -- References -- Appendixes. [Appendix] A: Workshop Agenda -- [Appendix] B: Biographical Sketches of the Moderators and Speakers -- [Appendix] C: Workshop Speaker Disclosures
520 ▼a "Governments, philanthropic organizations, and private industry fund human health and medical research. Various funding sources might bias research so that the results are more favorable to their agents. Funders may influence investigative scope, specific questions posed, experimental design, and principal investigator appointments. Reporting, analysis, dissemination, and communication and data availability, reanalysis, and replication can also experience bias from a funding source. To explore structures, processes, and principles to ensure high-quality health research independent of sponsor influence, the National Academies Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice and the Board on Health Sciences Policy hosted a public virtual workshop in December 2022 that examined the sources of funding for health research and evidence on whether they influence the quality and outcomes of resulting health research. The workshop also discussed models, process, and principles used to protect the independence and quality of research. This Proceedings summarizes the discussions held during the workshop."--Publisher's website.
650 0 ▼a Medicine ▼x Research ▼z United States.
650 0 ▼a Medical policy ▼z United States.
650 0 ▼a Research and development partnership ▼z United States.
650 6 ▼a Médecine ▼x Recherche ▼z États-Unis.
650 6 ▼a Politique sanitaire ▼z États-Unis.
650 6 ▼a Sociétés de recherche et de développement ▼z États-Unis.
650 7 ▼a Medical policy ▼2 fast
650 7 ▼a Medicine ▼x Research ▼2 fast
650 7 ▼a Research and development partnership ▼2 fast
651 7 ▼a United States ▼2 fast
7001 ▼a Boyle, Elizabeth, ▼e rapporteur.
7001 ▼a McKay, Alexandra, ▼e rapporteur
7001 ▼a Alper, Joe, ▼e rapporteur.
7102 ▼a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). ▼b Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, ▼e issuing body.
7102 ▼a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). ▼b Board on Health Sciences Policy. ▼e issuing body.
7102 ▼a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). ▼b Health and Medicine Division. ▼e issuing body.
85640 ▼3 EBSCOhost ▼u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=3661351